Page 1 of 1

#1 Spreading the workload

Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 11:00 am
by Andrew
I have a few machines working on 5 (for the time being) projects. I'm just wondering how you guys who have a large number of machines tend to spread the load.
I realise that it's best to keep any one machine doing more than a single project incase there is an outage, but say you have 10 machines and 15 projects in total, do all your machines run all projects at the same percentages, or do you tend to have project specific machines, each with a backup project running at 10%...just incase.

Hope I've asked my question clearly enough, not exactly critical but I'm curious to see how the hardcore crunchers do it :)

Andrew

#2 Re: Spreading the workload

Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 3:24 pm
by Temujin
Hi Andrew

I don't know about anyone else but I tend to run all my 40+ machines on just a single project, seti.
They all run with a 5 day cache which gets them over all but the longest outages.
On the rare occasions they do run out of seti work I normally switch them over to a short period project like milkyway.

#3

Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 5:38 pm
by MacDitch
Your probably best seeing what suits each machine. I run everything on my main rig and whatever (short duration) project takes my fancy on the laptops - when they're on!

The machine at work can't upload/download so it gets things with distant deadlines. This used to mean projects like SETI and SZTAKI which had 4-6 week deadlines but for the last few months (year? more?) has been CPDN as each workunit takes months and they have no 'deadline' as such.

I would personally recomend 4-5 projects as a minimum to cover down time; but this can be reduced if you are attached to 'stable' projects - if you can find any!

I'm sure others will let you know their preferences...

#4

Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 6:31 pm
by Buster Gunn
I tend to run only 1 project per machine but I do load up the queues with 10 days worth of work. I have a few projects that I use for fill-in, in case of a hiccup. Prime Grid and Riesel Sieve always have work, their run times are short and easy to start up. I do have 2 machines that run as many as 10 projects at a time. I use these to work on my anal goal of getting ALL my projects over the 10K mark. It also helps me keep my CPID's in line.

#5

Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 8:08 pm
by Andrew
Thanks for the replies guys, just thought it would be interesting to see how the experts did things :)

#6

Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 8:39 pm
by MacDitch
Thanks for the replies guys, just thought it would be interesting to see how the experts did things :)
Don't know about the others, but I definitely don't think I count as an expert. Slightly experienced user maybe...