Sierpinski / Riesel Base 5 LLR
Forum rules
-
- General Bitchin'
- Posts: 6371
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 1:15 pm
- Location: Huntly, Scotland
- Contact:
#11 Re: Sierpinski / Riesel Base 5 LLR
Bear in mind that I am just a Points Whore - doesn't matter to me if I find the Prime or not (although I do reckon wingman should get equal recognition for any primes found)
I think this is fool-proof but could you just try it for me please? • There are 10 types of people in the world; those who understand binary, and those who don’t
- Gibson Praise
- Boinc Colour Sergeant
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2016 4:13 am
- Location: Haunting Cheyenne Mountain
- Contact:
#12 Re: Sierpinski / Riesel Base 5 LLR
Go for it. I'd like to know how it turns out, definitely. PG has a strong cultural bias toward finding the prime!. The advice on the forums most always takes that as a given.
Tangent #1: February is the Tour de Prime at PG where the whole idea is to find t5k (top 5000) primes and for the first time in years I found one. Nifty badge and all! ( and yes, running GFN-16 gpu to get it was horribly inefficient and point-poor )
Tangent #2: I wonder what the Venn diagram of Post Whores and Points Whores looks like?
-
- General Bitchin'
- Posts: 6371
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 1:15 pm
- Location: Huntly, Scotland
- Contact:
#13 Re: Sierpinski / Riesel Base 5 LLR
Are you trying to tell me that I post too much?
I think this is fool-proof but could you just try it for me please? • There are 10 types of people in the world; those who understand binary, and those who don’t
- Gibson Praise
- Boinc Colour Sergeant
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2016 4:13 am
- Location: Haunting Cheyenne Mountain
- Contact:
- scole of TSBT
- Boinc Major General
- Posts: 5980
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 2:38 pm
- Location: Goldsboro, (Eastern) North Carolina, USA
#15 Re: Sierpinski / Riesel Base 5 LLR
On my dual CPU 14c/28t Xeon V4 rigs, linux Mint 19.1 is slightly faster than Win7 64 and the sweet spot for these chips appears to be 7 threads per WU. I started at 28t per WU, then 14t, 7t and 4t. Pay per thread increased to 7t per WU, then the pay per thread dropped running 4t per WU.
-
- General Bitchin'
- Posts: 6371
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 1:15 pm
- Location: Huntly, Scotland
- Contact:
#16 Re: Sierpinski / Riesel Base 5 LLR
How many 7t threads were you running simultaneously please? And how does the PPD look?
I think this is fool-proof but could you just try it for me please? • There are 10 types of people in the world; those who understand binary, and those who don’t
- scole of TSBT
- Boinc Major General
- Posts: 5980
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 2:38 pm
- Location: Goldsboro, (Eastern) North Carolina, USA
#17 Re: Sierpinski / Riesel Base 5 LLR
8x 7t WU at a time but I appear to have had an error in the formula. Re-testing.
-
- General Bitchin'
- Posts: 6371
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 1:15 pm
- Location: Huntly, Scotland
- Contact:
#18 Re: Sierpinski / Riesel Base 5 LLR
Okay, so HT on and hitting L3 cache as hard as you can.
I am scrapping all my notes and tackling it from the other end. HT still on but only very low counts of 4t WU until I get an idea of what each machine is capable of time-wise
Note to self: WU downloaded on 11-Feb fit this description
I am scrapping all my notes and tackling it from the other end. HT still on but only very low counts of 4t WU until I get an idea of what each machine is capable of time-wise
Note to self: WU downloaded on 11-Feb fit this description
I think this is fool-proof but could you just try it for me please? • There are 10 types of people in the world; those who understand binary, and those who don’t
- scole of TSBT
- Boinc Major General
- Posts: 5980
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 2:38 pm
- Location: Goldsboro, (Eastern) North Carolina, USA
#19 Re: Sierpinski / Riesel Base 5 LLR
Dual Xeon V4 14c/28t 3Ghz, HT on
OS | Threads per WU | # WU | Avg credit per thread-run-second |
---|---|---|---|
Win7 | 7 | 8 | 0.033270248 |
linux | 4 | 14 | 0.021093011 |
linux | 7 | 8 | 0.034808078 |
linux | 14 | 4 | 0.031545409 |
-
- General Bitchin'
- Posts: 6371
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 1:15 pm
- Location: Huntly, Scotland
- Contact:
#20 Re: Sierpinski / Riesel Base 5 LLR
Thank you. What is approx run time on "linux 7 8" please
2990WX : Average at 4 x 4t: 12067 secs (2139pts / WU)
3900X : Average at 3 x 4t : 6251 secs ( 2249pts / WU)
asus2: Average at 2 x 4t: 8415 secs
t7910: Average at 2 x 4t: 9715 secs
asus1: 9614
2990WX : Average at 4 x 4t: 12067 secs (2139pts / WU)
3900X : Average at 3 x 4t : 6251 secs ( 2249pts / WU)
asus2: Average at 2 x 4t: 8415 secs
t7910: Average at 2 x 4t: 9715 secs
asus1: 9614
I think this is fool-proof but could you just try it for me please? • There are 10 types of people in the world; those who understand binary, and those who don’t
- scole of TSBT
- Boinc Major General
- Posts: 5980
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 2:38 pm
- Location: Goldsboro, (Eastern) North Carolina, USA
-
- General Bitchin'
- Posts: 6371
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 1:15 pm
- Location: Huntly, Scotland
- Contact:
#22 Re: Sierpinski / Riesel Base 5 LLR
Hmmm - I think my 2990wx machines might be throttling back due to heat. What is their max running temperature before that happens please?
I think this is fool-proof but could you just try it for me please? • There are 10 types of people in the world; those who understand binary, and those who don’t
#23 Re: Sierpinski / Riesel Base 5 LLR
I think it is 65C. I have to down clock mine to stock (3.0) to run PG. @3.3 they throttle ... on air.